Trends in Media Control

Read Time:1 Minute, 33 Second

Over the past week, Trump has revealed plans to select journalists and media that are allowed to cover future presidential activities. Meanwhile, the Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos announced that the newspaper’s opinion part will now play a partisan role. Two recent changes have raised questions about the future of fair, accurate press. These developments may affect the public's ability to visit nonpartisan sources to make informed decisions. The White House Journalist Association is a journalist organization dedicated to transparent coverage of the Presidential Administration, has been monitoring the presidential media library and independently selected independent journalists for the president's activities and reported on the Trump administration's actions. Within a large range, the influence of numerous characters is well known, and the influence of the media is increasing. The journalists he chose may include those who are in the favor of the president, which may lead to future presidential coverage, lacking a wide variety of views. One day later, Bezos responded to the idea of selective reporting. On X, he claimed a conservative shift in the opinion section of The Washington Post, noting that the remaining views will be “published by others.” Given the size of such a large publication, this change may indicate a change in the major news outlets. Selecting publications with the one-sided viewpoint section may become a tool to control narrative. Although media influence is not a new phenomenon, clear publications suggest that their partisan openness may focus on their own perspectives, risking suppressing central information that inhibits public interest and informed decision-making. With the changes in Trump and Bezos, the trends in the political scope are becoming ever-changing and this may become ever-changing. Compromised, the president and major publications performed well in both media and political control.

Source link