Judge rules Jay-Z's accusers can remain anonymous, criticizes rapper's lawyers for aggressive tactics

Read Time:1 Minute, 35 Second

A New York judge has ruled that the identity of the woman who accused Jay-Z of raping her when she was 13 will remain anonymous, despite efforts by the rapper's attorney Alex Spiro to reveal her name. Judge Torres has intervened in Jay-Z v. Tony Buzbee, a victory for Buzbee. She allowed the plaintiffs to proceed anonymously, at least for now, and noted Alex Spiro's approach that “courts will not expedite justice just because lawyers ask for it.” pic.twitter.com/ QhdDZ5cKPT — Meghann Cuniff (@meghanncuniff) December 26, 2024 Judge Analisa Torres criticizes Spiro approach, calling his repeated motions “combative” and full of “inflammatory language and personal attacks.” Torres said in Thursday's filing that “Carter's attorneys' relentless filing of combative motions … was inappropriate, a waste of judicial resources, and a tactic unlikely to benefit his client.” The court would not simply The judicial process will be expedited just because the lawyer requests it. The plaintiff, identified in the lawsuit as “Jane Doe,” accuses Jay-Z (real name Shawn Carter) and Sean “Diddy” Combs of allegedly Jane Doe claims she was sexually assaulted at a party, according to the lawsuit. The lawsuit alleges that Combs was invited to a party when her alleged limousine driver approached her, and she claimed she was asked to sign a nondisclosure agreement after drinking a glass of wine at the party. , she was drugged and then raped by Combs and Carter while an unnamed female celebrity watched. The disturbing allegations were refiled in the Southern District of New York earlier this month, Jay said. -Z Spiro's legal team has denied the claims, suggesting they are part of a settlement plan from celebrity attorney Tony Buzbee Like this: .Discover more from Baller Alert Subscribe to have the latest posts delivered to your email.

Source link