data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c710d/c710d3589b1d35786308a3dd2f2d8a6e4d6b07f7" alt="Josh Allen won the award, but is Lamar Jackson worth it? Josh Allen won the award, but is Lamar Jackson worth it?"
When NFL honors began last night, fans quickly noticed that quarterback Lamar Jackson was not in attendance, which sparked fears of writing on the wall – Josh Allen will Receive the most valuable player trophy. Each won a match. However, Allen won the most important game in the playoffs, falling into Kansas City in the AFC Championship. Allen has a historic season, completing 64% completion rate, 3,371 pass yards, 28 touchdowns and 6 interceptions. Jackson was named a first-team all-pro player but failed to win the MVP and contradicted some. ESPN's Dan Orlovsky talked about the topic this morning, explaining why he voted for Allen while giving Jackson's first team full of votes, a position that led him to co-host and former NFL player Dominique Foxworth was frustrated. Allen is more valuable to his team, a narrative that many voters use to justify their choice. “I think they both have MVPs – caliber season, but it feels like you’re trying to find the little semantics, trapped doors…because you don’t want Foxworth to tell Olovsky on ESPN’s wake up (Orlovsky). “Na Lamar Jackson has the best season this year… Usually the MVP means who is the best guy in the league. Apparently, Josh has an MVP caliber season. But the best guy in the league this year is the all-around player on the first team. This award. I won't kill it, but not only based on my estimates, they made it wrong, their own. “May be swapped the MVP trophy for Patrick Mahomes' post – playing this Sunday in the Super Bowl in New Orleans.
Source link