Drake's lawsuit highlights the role Kai Senat and other creators play in spreading false accusations of “not like us.” A breakdown of some of his claims:

Read Time:2 Minute, 24 Second

Just when fans thought Drake was ready to make peace with Universal Music Group and Spotify, he filed a new federal defamation lawsuit. Here are some of the most interesting claims from his recent legal proceedings. The “Scorpion” performer accused record labels and labels of promoting Kendrick Lamar's now-infamous diss song “Not Like Us” and spreading “false and malicious narratives.” The 81-page lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, accuses UMG of using illegal tactics to boost the song's popularity. Drake claims that this is one of the funniest promotional tactics used by some Youtubers. He said UMG enabled content creators with large followings, such as Kai Cenat, Zias, NoLifeShaq, RDC Gaming and CartierFamily, to monetize reactions to Not Like Us without executing a copyright strike. Drizzy explained that a lack of enforcement allowed defamatory messages against him to spread, while generating profits for the record label and creators. Drake claims in the lawsuit that UMG allows content creators such as Kai Cenat, Zias, NoLifeShaq, RDC Gaming and CartierFamily to monetize reactions to “Not Like Us” without enforcing copyright claims. He claims that this lack of enforcement allowed the spread of defamation… pic.twitter.com/FZzip1QrTf — FearBuck (@FearedBuck) January 15, 2025 As he mentioned in previous legal filings against UMG and Spotify Arriving, Drake noted that Lamar called him a “certified pedophile” and a “predator.” The 38-year-old took issue with the cover art depicting his Toronto home, “the icons used by law enforcement to identify the homes of child sex offenders online. Like Us”: “Just before UMG originally released the recording And image three days later, Drake was attacked by armed intruders at his Toronto home in the equivalent of 2024's 'Pizzagate'” https://t.co/EVhVle8tsx pic.twitter.com/fMwDvoWQLp — Meghann Cuniff (@meghanncuniff) January 15, 2025 Another key element in the filing is that false lyrics about him being a pedophile incited violence at his home, leading to the closure of his property on May 7, 2024 was shot. One gunman reportedly yelled “F**k Drake” before opening fire, hitting his security guard. Two more break-in attempts occurred in the following days, both of which failed. Stopped by security. The rap star thought it was this May 4 While Drizzy has previously accused the label of using bots to inflate Lamar's streams, he now says he received receipts proving it was done in an effort to garner at least 30 million additional streams. Calling Drake's new lawsuit “frivolous” and “illogical,” the company says the rapper is trying to “use the weapon of legal process” to suppress Lamar's “creative expression.” Like this: .From Baller AlertSubscribe Discover more in and get the latest posts delivered to your email.

Source link