Didi's legal team takes action to suppress evidence, claiming the government misleads the court

Read Time:1 Minute, 50 Second

Sean Diddy's legal team brought a motion that challenged the legality of multiple search warrants, believing that federal prosecutors misled the court and violated his Fourth Amendment rights. The filing filed on Sunday, February 23 argued that the government retained exploitative evidence, distorted the facts and used an oversearch warrant to conduct searches for combed houses, iCloud accounts, phone calls and hotel rooms. , the government intentionally omitted key evidence that would provide important background for the magistrate who approved the arrest warrant. The defense said the prosecutor included only the charges, while missing key facts that could undermine the possible causes. The document also claimed that the government failed to disclose evidence that at least one victim participated in the incident voluntarily, rather than being forced, contradicted the prosecutor's narrative. The motion further accused the government of securing a warrant through “systemic deception”, arguing that the prosecutor omitted financial incentives about witnesses to fabricate and modify details of his claims. Combs' legal team asserted that federal agents deliberately removed statements and text messages from the context to strengthen their case while hiding information that might be credible to witnesses. resulting in a high-profile military-style attack on comb properties. Combs' lawyers believe there are defective guarantee procedures from the outset and require the court to suppress all evidence obtained through these searches. If not suppressed, they will ask for a Franks hearing, which will allow them to challenge the legality of the warrants and check whether law enforcement is interested or reckless to add false information to their applications. and prostitution charges, which are based on the narratives of at least three women. His defense argued that one of the accused, Cassie Ventura, was a willing participant, contradicted the prosecutor's claim. Court prosecutors have not commented on the motion, but are expected to make a formal response in court. Meanwhile, Combs' lawyers maintained the innocence of clients, saying, “Facts will prevail: Mr. Combs never sexually assaulted or trafficked anyone.” Like this: Like loading… Find more from Baller Alertsubscribe More information to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Source link