
The Cleveland Browns are in a unique position in the first round of the NFL draft as they sit in third place. The Browns can bring Abdul Carter, a game-changing defensive end, out of Penn State. They even have the option of two-way star Travis Hunter. The Cleveland Browns have a lot of holes to fill, especially at the most important position: quarterback. The only people who signed the contract at the moment are aging veterinarians Joe Flacco, Deshaun Watson and Kenny Pickett. There were rumors in the past that the Cleveland Browns were linked to Dallas quarterback Dak Prescott, but until now, it was just noise. The idea of Cleveland making trades in the trade and possibly including their second-round draft pick (No. 33) could get them back and still get a future quarterback Thursday night. ESPN's Dan Orlovsky and Marcus Spears objected when the Browns chose Travis Hunter's idea. They claim that Hunter, who came to Cleveland, won’t make the team better tomorrow and that he may have wasted a draft pick due to the offense. “Travis Hunter isn't a full-time receiver of his life, and you want the NFL franchise to start betting on the first day of the quarterback that you're the catcher of your number one range? Cleveland picked the third pick and even play cornerback when Cleveland already has one of Denzel Ward's best guys. The Hunter is a true generational talent. But fit may not make the most sense for Cleveland. Check out Spear's video.
Source link